Influence of dislocationsolute atom interactions and stacking fault energy on grain size of single-phase alloys after severe plastic deformation using high-pressure torsions

Kaveh Edalati a,b, Daichi Akama b, Asuki Nishio b, Seungwon Lee a,b, Yosuke Yonenaga b,
Jorge M. Cubero-Sesin b, Zenji Horita a,b

a Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University,
Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
b WPI, International Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu University,
Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan

Several pure metals (magnesium, aluminum, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, palladium and silver) and single-phase AlMg, AlAg, AlCu, CuAl, CuZn, PdAg, NiFe and NiCo alloys were processed by severe plastic deformation using high-pressure torsion (HPT). The steady-state grain size was decreased and hardness increased by alloying in all the systems as shown in Fig.1. It was shown that the dominant factor for extra grain refinement by alloying was due to the effect of solutematrix atomic-size mismatch and modulus interaction on the mobility of edge dislocations. For the selected alloys, unlike pure metals, the grain size was almost insensitive to the melting temperature as shown in Fig.2(a), and like pure metals, no systematic correlation was established between the grain size and stacking fault energy (chemical interaction) as in Fig.2(b) or between the grain size and valence electrons (electrical interaction). The presence of a power-law relation, with n = 0.56, between the hardness normalized by the shear modulus and grain size normalized by the Burgers vector as shown in Fig.3 signified the large contribution of grain boundaries to the hardening. The contribution of the solid-solution effect to the total hardening appeared to be 15% as shown in Fig.4.

[Published in Acta Materialia, 69 (2014) pp 68-77.]

Fig. 1 Plots of dS vs. c, where dS is the steady-state grain size and c is the concentration of solute atoms.
Fig. 2 Plots of dS/b vs. (a) T/Tm and (b)SFE/Gb. (dS, steady-state grain size; b, Burgers vector; T, processing temperature; Tm, melting temperature; SFE, stacking fault energy; G, shear modulus.)

Fig. 3 Plots of HVS/G vs. dS/b, where HVS is the steady-sate hardness, G is the shear modulus, dS is the steady-state grain size and b is the Burgers vector. Fig. 4 Plots of contribution of solid-solution hardening to total hardness vs. concentration of solute atoms calculated using Labusch’s model for edge dislocations.